Where has political honor gone?

I watched the recent WI state legislative action with a mixture of astonishment and disgust. Here were a bunch of Republican Senators, shoving through an anti-union agenda without so much as a by-your-leave from the voting public.

Let me be clear, I have no issues with the procedural track of the bill, rather I have problems with the ethics behind it. Consider this: Wisconsin changed greatly in the last elections, moving from a democratic to republican majority in one cycle. Unfortunately, not a single republican candidate campaigned on busting unions. Not a single republican party plank showed this. Worse, the Union busting legislature itself was disguised in a “budget repair bill” that was brought before the legislation with a fast-track passage rider. When democratic representatives read the language, they had little time to do anything but flee the State in an effort to expose the bill to the public.

Republican rhetoric pushed the “we’re broke” issue even as the Unions gave the monetary concessions requested in the bill itself.

Nothing worked. Finally, republican senators passed the union busting portion of the bill without the monetary provisions. That was astonishing to me because the bill itself was supposedly written to head off a looming Wisconsin deficit. Next, the republican senatorial leader crowed to Fox News that busting the unions would deny Barack Obama funding for his presidential campaign and help keep Wisconsin red during the next election cycle. Add this to the systematic breakdown of all political campaign funding limitations by his federal counterparts and you have the first real truth uttered by a public representative here. Apparently, this was the true reason for the bill and the real agenda hidden from the voting public.

As voters, we were duped, lied to, and deceived. My parents are republicans and they taught me honor, and respect. This party is not their party. They must feel wretched indeed as they watch the younger generation of republicans renounce everything they stood for.

Sigh. Once again, as a good friend of mine oft says: If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.

Posted in Politics | Comments Off

Solar Efficiency to soar

Here’s something I uncovered while randomly surfing.  As you know, I track solar developments with great enthusiasm.  This is a bona-fide breakthrough for this energy source!

Source: Mother Nature Network
Publication date: February 9, 2011

By Karl Burkart

HyperSolar magnifying film can increase solar panel efficiency by up to 300%, making solar competitive with fossil fuels.

Solar Panel Magnifying Layer
(Image courtesy of HyperSolar)

As the U.S. government continues to heap billions in subsidies to the world’s wealthiest coal and oil companies, the solar industry has been struggling to make it in the United States. This is sad for many reasons, not the least of which is that we’re missing out on one of the biggest growth industries in the world.
Currently there are 16 gigawatts of installed solar power globally. That number will grow to about 1,800 gigawatts in the next 20 years, making it one of the best job creators. U.S. engineers invented the solar panel, and the U.S. should be dominating that market. Instead, foreign manufacturers (particularly in China) have taken our IP and run with it, as we become increasingly dependent on foreign oil and dirty coal operations to meet our power needs.
Fortunately HyperSolar, a new U.S. company, offers a ray of sunny hope on the clean energy frontier.
The company does not manufacture solar panels. It makes them ultra-efficient using a field of science called photonics. Similar to a microchip that moves individual bits of data around at hyperspeed, HyperSolar’s thin magnifying film routes and separates specific light spectrums, delivering them exactly where they’re needed to make an array of PV solar cells ultra-efficient.
I saw an early prototype for such a magnifying optical layer a few years back, but the company was “dark” at the time, so I couldn’t write about the innovation. But I’m as excited now as I was then for good reason — HyperSolar’s optical layer can increase PV efficiency by up to 300 percent!
Theoretically that means cutting the installation cost of a solar array in half. Instead of a home solar system costing $30,000 (or more) it would only cost $15,000 (or less), making the upfront investment much lower and payback periods much quicker.
This is a great example of a disruptive technology that could get us to the holy grail of “grid parity” — meaning that solar would be as affordable as other sources of energy like coal and natural gas. And no more polluting coal mines or fracking for natural gas! The sun (for at least the next 5 billion years) will provide free and abundant energy. It’s up to us whether we want to invest in that technology or continue to destroy our beautiful landscapes for a few more years of “cheap” (i.e. heavily subsidized) coal.
Innovations like this make several recent reports ring true. If we have the political will to overcome the stranglehold of the fossil fuel industry on our nation’s energy policy, we could become 100 percent renewably powered in a 2030-2050 time frame. Check out these two reports and a new study by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) about how large-scale wind power is now cost-competitive with natural gas:
Posted in Energy | 1 Comment

Something to google

Here’s something to find out more about:

What was the Carrington event of 1859? Do the research and draw your own conclusions. Don’t you wonder why you haven’t heard about it before?

Now lets have a discussion…

Posted in Our Fragile Planet | Comments Off

Here’s a car for you

Tesla  Model S Coupe.

Electric powered.
0-60 in 5.6 seconds.
120mph top speed.
seating for 5 adults plus 2 children.
300 miles on a charge with optional high capacity battery pack.
Quick charge capability takes the battery from 10% to 80% charged in 45 minutes.

Base price: $49,000 after rebates includes standard battery pack with 160 mile range.  Delivery begins in 2012.

Yowza!  Find out more here: Tesla Motors Model S

Posted in Energy, Gizmos | Comments Off

Here’s some ideas:

OK, its all not just doom and gloom.  There’s real out-of-the-box brainstorming going on too.  If you ask me, brainstorming is what we humans are best at.  Ultimately, our way past the climate problem may be along this path.  Sooo… what ideas do you have?

Thanks to Bloomberg.net for this writeup:

Aug. 7 (Bloomberg) — A fleet of sail-powered, ocean-going vessels spraying sea water in the air could save billions of dollars and allow the world to continue emitting carbon dioxide like it does by burning oil and coal.

Marine cloud whitening, which allows solar radiation to bounce off water vapor, at $9 billion would be more cost- effective than reducing CO2 emissions, according to a study by the think tank headed by Bjoern Lomborg, a professor at the Copenhagen Business School.

Geo-engineering projects like cloud whitening and painting roofs white to reflect heat are attracting attention among some policy makers as the world looks at alternative ways to combat global warming. Most plans to cut CO2 emissions involve using more wind and solar power, boosting energy efficiency and constructing air-tight buildings.

“People are only hearing about one solution to climate change and that’s to cut carbon-dioxide emissions,” Lomborg, author of “The Skeptical Environmentalist” (Cambridge University Press, 2001), said in a telephone interview. “In a recession, I’m sure people see the point in finding the cheapest and most effective ways of fighting climate change.”

The study on alternatives to reducing CO2 emissions comes four months before negotiators from more than 180 countries meet in Copenhagen as part of United Nations-sponsored talks to find ways to reduce greenhouse gases and limit global temperature gains to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) after an increase of about 0.8 degrees since industrialization.

White Clouds

Spraying salt water would introduce salt particles onto which water vapor can condense, forming white clouds in the same way they are created from sulphates emitted from ship engine exhausts and dust from volcanoes. The process would help to reflect 1 to 2 percent of the sun’s radiation and “cancel out” the warming caused by doubling the levels of atmospheric CO2 since pre-industrial times, according to the report.

The unmanned ships spraying the sea water would be powered by the wind, with electricity generated by turbines using the vessel’s movement through the water to provide energy for the spray. The system would yield $2,000 worth of climate benefits for every dollar spent, according to Eric Bickel and Lee Lane, the researchers who wrote the report. The document didn’t specify how many ships would be needed.

The world should try to have “white roofs everywhere” to help fight climate change, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said on May 26. Painting flat roofs of homes and commercial buildings white would reflect more of the sun’s heat back to space and reduce electricity used for air conditioning by as much as 15 percent, Chu said.

‘Frankenstein Ideas’

“Some of these geo-engineering solutions are like Frankenstein ideas,” said Kim Carstensen, head of the World Wildlife Federation’s global climate initiative. “There are consequences that we only half know about. And it doesn’t offer solutions on the scale we require.”

Sea fertilization, which involves adding iron shavings to the sea to promote the growth of CO2-absorbing algae, is another idea attracting attention.

Humans need to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by 50 percent to 85 percent by 2050 in order to limit the risk of exceeding the 2-degree target. Exceeding that figure would mean rising sea levels that swamp coastal cities, drought and desertification elsewhere, the United Nations Environment Programme says.

‘Eye Off Ball’

“The biggest problem I see with geo-engineering is that it invites us to take our eye off the ball,” said Chris Henschel, a policy manager at the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. “The world’s attention needs to be focused on getting a strong agreement in Copenhagen for major reductions in emissions.”

Tweaking Mother Nature’s ways may come with a price. Research still needs to be done to determine the effects of geo- engineering and how rain patterns, cloud formations and other atmospheric processes may be altered, Lomborg said.

“It’s true that everything comes with a risk,” he said. “But there are also risks connected with carbon-dioxide cuts.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Berlin at jvanloon@bloomberg.netChristian Wienberg in Copenhagen at cwienberg@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Todd White at twhite2@bloomberg.net; David Merritt at dmerritt1@bloomberg.net; John Deane at jdeane3@bloomberg.net.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Something Europeans should know

The deep freeze of 2010.  Proof that there is no global warming.  I mean, how can there be global warming when everything’s freezing across the entire European continent?

That’s the conventional wisdom driving many people to conclude that the “scientific evidence” being evangelized by many is some sort of fabrication designed to cast uncertainty and doubt at best, or a carefully contrived lie whose entire purpose is to enrich personal wealth at worst.  In either case, how can these supposed “scientists” continue to spout this drivel in the face of  such overwhelming evidence?

How indeed.

Perhaps we should consider this:  Europe is North.  Way North.  But thanks to the great Atlantic conveyor, enough warm water pours past to allow Palm trees to exist in Ireland.  This fact is unbelievable in itself when one considers the latitude of Belfast, a city in the middle of Ireland, is 54 degrees, 37 minutes North.  That’s less than 300 miles south of Juneau Alaska.  Heck, Minneapolis Minnesota, at 46 degrees, 55 minutes North latitude is itself about 450 miles south of Belfast.

Now to the scary part.  Here are some pictures of the great Atlantic conveyor showing heat disbursement.  First, one from October of 2008:

Now here’s that same picture, taken in October 2010:

Ok, so what’s going on?  Notice the yellow band.  About the same location in both shots.  But why is the region around England so much more blue in 2010 than it is in 2008.  For the answer, look to the left at the large dark blue plume coming from Newfoundland that simply wasn’t there in 2008.  It’s pretty easy to see its effect on warm currents traveling Northward.  (As an aside, check out the increased equatorial heat zone too.  I wonder what effect that is having?)

Here’s the scary part:  Do you know what the blue plume is?  It is cold, fresh water coming from the accelerated ice melt that’s occurring up there.  Pretty much proof of what scientists are warning us about.   It’s effect on the conveyor is quite easy to see.  Without the Atlantic conveyor, Europe reverts to the kind of climate it should have.

Feel free to check out the current data yourself from the NOAA site.  Here’s the link: ROTFS (Atlantic).  Be sure to switch to salinity view to see what I’m talking about.

What’s the lesson here?  Simply, it is this: “global warming” is about increased energy in the system.  It doesn’t mean that every place on Earth will get hotter; rather it means that everything on Earth will change.  Storm systems will intensify, climatic regions will shift and with it, people will suddenly find that the infrastructure they’ve built based on their local climate will have suddenly become very, very inadequate.  Heck, I remember that the house I lived at in Rochdale, Lancashire England when I was 10 had external plumbing because nothing ever froze there.  That plumbing was painted bright green too!

The next effect of climate change, if drastic enough, could lead to mass migration as people try to escape from conditions that have suddenly become hostile.  At very least, economic problems must multiply as people try to adjust to the change.  Consider my childhood home in England as a case in point:  The plumbing was external because the walls were solid.  No major insulation was needed because of the mild climate.  Heck, it didn’t even have central heating.  Now those pipes have frozen.  The bathrooms don’t work any more.  There’s no running water.  What can poor Graham Litchfield (the man who bought the house) do now?  How much will it cost him?  Now multiply that problem by the rest of the reigon.  External plumbing is common in England.

The major effects of global warming are beginning.  If you haven’t seen the Palm trees of Ireland yet, it’s quite possible that you never will.

Posted in Our Fragile Planet | Comments Off

MIT Students in action

Here’s another one I uncovered today.  It’s this kind of thinking that will transform our fragile planet and benefit everybody in the process.

Be sure to also check out Co.Design for more commentary on innovative design projects around the world.  Or follow John whose focus is ecological/green ventures.  Excellent site!

Source: Co.Design
Publication date: November 22, 2010

By John Pavlus

Sanergy, a startup founded by two students at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, aims to redesign the slum-sanitation ecosystem with a jolt of economic self-sufficiency. They plan to turn pit latrines into just one component of a vertically integrated business that would not only make clean sanitation more commonplace but create local jobs and a sustainable energy source for the community.

First, the latrines themselves: Sanergy aims to build $200 modular “sanitation centers” that are owned and operated by local entrepreneurs in a franchise business model. That incentivizes the community to use and maintain the centers as a valuable part of their local economy. The facilities themselves are upgraded as well — manufactured in a fabrication lab at the University of Nairobi, they’re designed to be instantly visible from far away, sanitary, and safe.

Each sanitation center needs about 75 people to use it daily in order to be economical. (Currently they’re getting about 10 to 20 visits per day.) But that’s just the “san” part of Sanergy’s business model. The energy part comes from a value chain that employs local contractors to transport latrine waste to a processing facility that will use microorganisms to turn it into biogas (for cooking and electricity generation) and organic fertilizer. Those products, in turn, can then be sold back to the community. MIT estimates that such a model could pump up to $75 million back into Kenya’s economy, if Sanergy’s system were implemented in all of the country’s slums.

That’s a tall order, so Sanergy is starting small: they’re currently raising venture capital to fund a pilot program next summer comprising 25 sanitation centers.

[Read more at MIT]

Posted in Energy, Our Fragile Planet | Comments Off

To the TSA, my government and the American People

The best way I can describe my feelings about the “enhanced security measures at airports” is to simply quote one of America’s founding fathers.  Perhaps you know this one:

“Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.”

-Ben Franklin

As one of my best friends once said: “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention”.

What’s next to keep us secure I ask?  Checkpoints on the streets?  Carry your papers with you at all times?  Travel by government permission only? Police entering your house without a warrant “looking for potential terrorists”?

Come on people, wake up and smell the roses!!!  Use the power you have: VOTE!  Write your congressman!  Demonstrate on the streets!  This is wrong!!!

Or would you rather roll over and simply tell your children that nobody can touch them there except the government?

The choice, for the moment, is ours.

Posted in Politics | Comments Off

I wonder what it was like…

Our Fragile Planet has faced 5 great extinctions during it’s 4.5 billion year history.

  • First major extinction (c. 440 million years ago): Climate change (relatively severe and sudden global cooling) seems to have been at work at the first of these-the end-Ordovician mass extinction that caused such pronounced change in marine life (little or no life existed on land at that time). 25% of families lost (a family may consist of a few to thousands of species).
  • Second major extinction (c. 370 million years ago): The next such event, near the end of the Devonian Period, may or may not have been the result of global climate change. 19% of families lost.
  • Third major Extinction (c. 245 million years ago): Scenarios explaining what happened at the greatest mass extinction event of them all at the end of the Permian Period have been complex amalgams of climate change perhaps rooted in plate tectonics movements. Very recently, however, evidence suggests that a bolide impact similar to the end-Cretaceous event may have been the cause. 54% of families lost.
  • Fourth major extinction (c. 210 million years ago): The event at the end of the Triassic Period, shortly after dinosaurs and mammals had first evolved, also remains difficult to pin down in terms of precise causes. 23% of families lost.
  • Fifth major extinction (c. 65 million years ago): Most famous, perhaps, was the most recent of these events at the end-Cretaceous. It wiped out the remaining terrestrial dinosaurs and marine ammonites, as well as many other species across the phylogenetic spectrum, in all habitats sampled from the fossil record. Consensus has emerged in the past decade that this event was caused by one (possibly multiple) collisions between Earth and an extraterrestrial bolide (probably cometary). Some geologists, however, point to the great volcanic event that produced the Deccan traps of India as part of the chain of physical events that disrupted ecosystems so severely that many species on land and sea rapidly succumbed to extinction. 17% of families lost.

What was it like during these great events, I wonder?  I imagine as I’m sure most of us do, that these were horrific events, filled with terror and trauma.  Dead and dying beasts lay everywhere while those species that were to be their successors cowered, hidden, waiting for the sun to come out once more so that they, like some phoenix risen, could claim the world as their own.

Reality is far from that I fear.  Yesterday I read a chilling report:  A fifth of the world’s vertebrate species (i.e. mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish) are now threatened with extinction, according to a massive new study by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN); and the situation is worsening for the world’s wildlife: on average 52 species of mammals, birds, and amphibians move one category closer to extinction every year.

These are vertibrates; 3% of all lifeforms.  The situation isn’t much better for the other 97% either.  The study also reported on a number of non-vertebrate species types—not included in the overall analysis—finding, for example, that 14% of seagrasses, 32% of freshwater crayfish, and 33% of coral reef species are threatened with extinction. An earlier study, looking at a representative sample of plants, found that 22% of the world’s plant species are threatened with extinction.

One of the most threatened groups of species on Earth is the cycads, an ancient group of plants: 63% percent of cycads face extinction.

We are in the Sixth Great Extinction now and it looks like nothing is changing at all to us.  There is no fire, no rotting bodies littering the land, no massive die outs.  Just a few disgruntled fishermen who say they wish for the “good old days” when their catches were plentiful.  Just a couple of stories about the beetles that are killing all the ash trees.  Does anybody remember what the tree that the christmas carol “chestnuts roasting on an open fire” refers to looks like?

Great events that shatter our fragile planet look like this.  The fact that we don’t have a direct sense of a timespan that covers more than one generation is the reason why we don’t see the catastrophic change that’s occurring all around us.

I wonder what the cowering new species waiting to inherit the planet looks like…

Posted in Our Fragile Planet | Comments Off

Weather…

Take a look at this:

No, not a hurricane in the traditional sense, but an intense, record setting  low pressure system that quickly formed over the Midwest United States.   In Wisconsin, on Tuesday morning October 26th at 11:35 AM, the recorded atmospheric pressure at its center was 28.22″ or 956 mb.  That’s the lowest pressure ever recorded for a non-tropical storm in the US.  Interestingly, pressure readings such as this are also typical for category 3 hurricanes.

As a hurricane, this storm didn’t disappoint much either.  With wind gusts of 81 mph, the low spawned 21 Tornadoes, knocked out power at hundreds of thousands of homes, and at one time stretched a staggering 1,200 miles from north to south.  Off Point Betsie on lake Michigan, surge heights were recorded at 18-23 ft.

My wife was a meteorologist about a decade ago and she was amazed when she brought up the weather maps yesterday.  “I’ve never seen anything like this here before” she remarked in a low voice, almost to herself as she showed me what was on the screen.  What I saw was a huge, almost perfectly circular pattern with tight, closely spaced isobars just west of us.  “It’s occluded too” she added.

Over the winter of 2009/2o10 we also noted increased energy in the overall weather.  Everything looked bigger, more intense, and carried more moisture.  This came as no surprise to us however.  In fact it was predicted by climate models for our region; a direct result of global warming which is adding energy to our entire planet’s weather patterns.  Of course, a climate model and its associated political rhetoric is one thing, but roofs getting torn off buildings by something never before recorded is something all together different.

As I write this, the low is intensifying over Canada as it heads North East with a pressure reading that is now 955 mb.  That’s approaching the reading for a Category 4 Hurricane…

How’s the weather been where you live?

Posted in Our Fragile Planet | Comments Off